A History of Missing Videos
There have been a minimum of 8 separate incidents between the Palo Alto Police and citizens in which 14 recording devices used by the Palo Alto Police failed to record those interactions.
1 (1 Recording Device) Officer Seghetti forgot to turn on the patrol car video recording device even though the recording device activates automatically when the flashing lights or siren are turned on and the officer had in fact turned on his lights. PAPD spokesperson Agent Dan Ryan acknowledged the design flaws and that officers forget to turn the recording device on. http://michaelgennacooir.weebly.com/cop-crash.html 2. (2 Recording Devices) Tyler Harney settles lawsuit with Palo Alto Police after judge rules that PAPD must turn over evidence that would determine if they tampered with the videos; for two separate MAV recorders malfunctioned simultaneously and thereby failed to record the severe injury that Harney sustained while being arrested. http://michaelgennacooir.weebly.com/harney.html 3. (1 Recording Device) A Palo Alto Police Officer failed to turn on his Mobile Audio Visual System, "MAV," recorder just prior to making an arrest in which a suspect sustained an unexplained head injury. Interestingly the officer thought he had turned the recording device on when in fact he had not demonstrating the flaws with the system. If an officer does not know if the MAV is on how will he know if it is recording? http://michaelgennacooir.weebly.com/head-injury.html http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/50425 4 and 5 (2+ Recording Devices) In the latest Police Auditor Report (March 2017 - April 3, 2017) there is a case regarding an officer failing to turn on his "Mobile Audio Visual System" "MAV" during and incident which involved a teenager. The officer had already been disciplined for not turning his MAV system on in 2015. Although there is nothing in the current report to indicate that the missing video has anything to do with the teenager mauled by a Palo Alto Police Dog the timing of both incidents do correlate to each other. Hopefully it will be clarified in the subsequent reports and the Teen's lawsuit whether or not the Dog Mauling was recorded by the officer's MAV system. http://chiefburns.weebly.com/dog-attack.html http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/56685 This pattern and practice reveals system flaws with the Mobile Audio Visual System as acknowledged by the Palo Alto Police. http://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/systemic-flaws.html 6 (4 Recording Devices) A) Ofc. Temores' Microphone's Battery -- Patrol Car recorder did not record audio because the battery to the microphone ran out of power even though the battery was charged when officer Temores went on duty 5 hours earlier and the battery can power the microphone for 10 continuous hours. One would think that if the microphone battery had 15 minutes of power it would have powered the microphone for the first 15 minutes of the interaction but it did not. http://michaelgennacooir.weebly.com/temores.html B) A Forensic expert determined that taser videos footage from two seperate recordings had been altered, edited with content being removed. http://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-3.html The Santa Clara County Crime Lab inadvertently verified that 4 seconds of video footage is missing from one of the taser videos. http://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-8.html C) The Santa Clara County Crime Lab verified that the taser videos match up to the both Temores' and Burger's MAV videos, thus since video footage is missing from the Taser videos there must be video footage missing from the two patorl car MAV videos. http://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-8.html D) See also that the officers confirmed that two taser guns fired taser probes. The video footage of the second taser gun firing is missing from both Temores' MAV recording and Taser recording. http://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-5.html The officers were forced to destroy evidence to conceal the missing video footage. http://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com 7 (2 Recording Devices)
We just learned on April 11, 2019 that on December 23, 2015, 3 years earlier, that Palo Alto Police Officers Sgt. Brian Philip and Officer Daniel Fino, Lt. James Reifschneider and officers Jeremy Schmidt and Paul Burgio beat a shoplifter suspect breaking his eye socket. The man was arrested for resisting arrest but the DA dropped the charges in part due to the fact that he had not shop lifted. The police claim that the store security said that the man was a potential shop lifter however this statement is contradicted by the store employee who said that she DID NOT say that the man had shop lifted but only that he was suspicious. We will never know what was truly said because the officers failed to record the incident on their MAV systems. 2 More Missing Recordings. https://padailypost.com/2019/04/11/newly-released-police-records-detail-violent-takedown-of-shoplifting-suspect/
https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/philip-fino-burgio.html 8 (2 Recording Devices)
Woman suffering from seizure caused by a Brain Tumor is denied Medical Treatment by Palo Alto Police Officer Adrienne Moore who either fails to record the incident on her body-worn camera and Car system or she destroys the recordings. Obviously with the knowledge of others in the police department and city staff. https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2019/09/20/on-the-ground-and-suffering-a-seizure-a-palo-alto-woman-pleaded-to-be-taken-to-the-hospital-but-police-kept-paramedics-from-helping-her-for-14-long-minutes https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2019/09/20/12-questions-the-city-wont-answer?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2019/09/20/911-nightmare-a-tug-of-war-for-information?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles |
Be careful of that which you say about others behind their backs you could, unawares, be forwarding slander onto others which was forwarded onto you initiated by the malicious.
|